A Study of Visual Functions Amongst Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients in Abuja, Nigeria https://doi.org/10.60787/NMJ-64-1-124

Main Article Content

Adaora Okudo
Olufemi Emmanuel Babalola
Adeola Onakoya
Adunola Ogunro
Aisha Sheriff Kalambe

Keywords

visual function, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual field, color vision, glaucoma

Abstract

Background: To objectively measure visual function amongst Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) patients and compare these with age and sex-matched controls by describing the characteristics of visual function in relation to the severity of POAG.


Methodology: A case-control study was carried out among 106 POAG patients and an equal number of age-sex matched controls attending Asokoro District Hospital, Abuja, and Eye Foundation Hospital Abuja from Nov 2012 to April 2013. The objective measures of visual function assessed include visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS), colour vision (CV), and visual fields (MD) in the better eye (BE)].


Results: All measures of visual function were found to be reduced comparing cases to controls and this was statistically significant. VABE (0.39±0.73; 0.0017±0.02p<0.001); MDBE (-8.02±6.80; 0.17±0.3P<0.001); CSBE (1.46±0.59; 1.90±0.16p<0.001): Colour vision defects (54.7%; 6.6% p<0.001). In comparing mild; moderate; severe glaucoma: VABE (0.0053±0.03; 0.057±0.08; 0.766±0.90 p<0.001); MDBE (-3.46±1.93;-8.17±3.55;-16.43±6.01p <0.001); CSBE (1.88±0.26; 1.69± 0.37; 1.11±0.59 p<0.001): Color vision defects (20.6%; 31.6%; 86.9%) respectively (BE: Better Eye). While looking at the two independent groups above, mild and moderate were not statistically significant except for the visual field, but comparing mild with severe and moderate with severe, they had a statistically significant relationship across all the visual functions tested. In comparing controls with mild, colour vision and visual field had a statistically significant difference. Comparing the groups with mild and moderate glaucoma, only visual fields as a visual function were statistically significant. Whereas comparing both groups with the severe group independently, they had statistically significant in all the visual functions tested.


Conclusion: In conclusion, visual function was reduced in glaucoma patients as compared to controls. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and colour vision differed significantly in comparing mild with severe and moderate with severe. Colour vision differed significantly in comparing mild to controls.

Abstract 444 | PDF Downloads 224

References

1.Weinreb RN, Leung CK, Crowston JG, Medeiros FA, Friedman DS, Wiggs JL, MartinKR. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16067. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.67.

2.Harasymowycz P, Birt C, Gooi P, Heckler L, Hutnik C, JinapriyaD, Shuba L, Yan D, Day R. Medical Management of Glaucoma in the 21st Century from a Canadian Perspective. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:6509809. doi: 10.1155/2016/6509809.

3.Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121:2081-90. doi: 0.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013.

4.Kyari F, EntekumeG, Rabiu M, Spry P, Wormald R, Nolan W, Murthy GV, Gilbert CE. A Population-based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in Nigeria: results from the Nigeria National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey.BMC Ophthalmol.2015;15::176. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0160-6.

5.Mbadugha CA. The impact of POAG on quality of life of patients attending the Guinness Eye Center, LUTH, Idi araba Lagos State. Dissertation for the award of Fellowship of National Postgraduate Medical College of Nigeria in Ophthalmology Nov 2009.

6.Cynthia O, Contrast Sensitivity, Ophthalmol Clin N Am.2003; 16:171 -177.

7.Freeman EE, Munoz B, West SK, Jampel HD, Friedman SD. Glaucoma and Quality of Life. The Salisbury Eye Evaluation American Academy of Ophthalmology2008; 115: 233-238.

8.Johnson GJ, Minasssian DC, Weale RA, West SK. Epidemiology of eye disorders 3rd Edition World Scientific Publishers 2012:

9.Kanski JJ. Clinical Ophthalmology.A systemic approach 6thEdition Butterworth Heinemann; Philadelphia 2006:14.

10.A new web-based color vision test CityUniversityLondon. [Online]. 2007 (Assessed 01/06/2012). Available from URL. http://www.city.ac.uk/health/research/research-areas/optometry/a-newwebbasedcolorvisiontest.

11.Amaryl MF. Genetic determination of cup/disc ratio of the optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol. 1967; 78: 35-43.

12.Hodapp E, Parrish RKII, Anderson DR: Clinical decisions in glaucoma.Mosby 1993.52-61

13.Janet P, Szlyk, Daniel P, Taglia JD, Jennifer P, Deepak P, Edward. Driving Performance In Patients With Mild To Moderate Vision Changes. Journal of Rehabilitation and Research Development2002; 39: 467 –490.

14.Kemal G, Gündüz K, Arden GB, Perry S, Weinstein GW, Hitchings RA. Color Vision Defects in Ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 106:929 –935.