Exploring the Persistence of Female Genital Mutilation: Primary Healthcare providers experience and their Perspective on Elimination.

Main Article Content

Joseph Agboeze
Matthew Igwe Nwali
Maria-Lauretta Orji
Maryjane Ikechukwu-Nwobodo
Sylvester Ikechukwu Ugwoke
Theresa Nwamaka Nnaji

Keywords

Female, Genital, Mutilation, Explore, Cutting, Persistence

Abstract

Background: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) remains widespread in Nigeria. With an estimated 19.9 million survivors, Nigeria accounts for the third highest number of women and girls who have undergone FGM worldwide. This study, therefore, aimed at identifying the factors that sustain the practice despite its illegality. Primary healthcare providers' experience and their perspectives on the elimination of FGM/C.


Methodology: This study used a descriptive qualitative design based on grounded theory. We used purposive sampling to identify and recruit primary health care providers. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted, and qualitative analysis was undertaken to develop a conceptual framework for understanding both the roots and the drivers of FGM.


Results: Historical traditions and religious rites preserve FGM and ensure its continuity, and older women and peers are a source of support for the practice through the pressure they exert. The easy movement of circumcisers across communities helps to perpetuate the practice, as does the belief that FGM will reduce promiscuity. Data collected between October and December 2023 were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Three themes exploring healthcare providers' perspectives on elimination of FGM/C were identified, namely understanding laws against FGM/C; perspectives on culturally sensitive education; and exploring public awareness raising activities in Nigeria.


Conclusion: Female Genital Mutilation continues to persist despite its illegality because of social pressure on women/girls to conform to social norms, peer acceptance, fear of criticism, and religious reasons. Implementing interventions targeting schools, religious leaders, older men, women, and strengthening Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act (VAPP) will help eradicate the practice.

Abstract 34 | PDF Downloads 13 EPUB Downloads 14

References

1. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/health- topic s/female- genital-mutilation #tab-tab_1
2. WHO. Female Genital Mutilation: Prevalence of FGM [Internet]. 2018. http://www.who.int/ reproductive health/topics/fgm/prevalence/en/
3. Odoi AT. Female genital mutilation: In Kwawukume EY, Emuveyan EE (eds) Comprehensive Gynaecology in the Tropics. 1st ed. Accra: Graphic Packaging Ltd; 2005. p. 268-78
4. Asaad MB. Female circumcision in Egypt: Social implications current research and prospects for change. Stud Fam Plan 1980;11:3-16.
5. Hathout HM. Some aspects of female circumcision. J Obstet Gynaecol Brit Emp 1963:70:505
6. Hosken FP. Genital and sexual mutilation of females. Thehosken report. 3rd Review ed. Vol. 18. Vienna Published by Women's International Network News (WINN); 1992. р. 4.
7. Dorkenoo E. Combating Female Genital Mutilation: An Agenda for the next Decade. 1996;
8. Toubia N. Female Genital Mutilation: A Call for Global Action. 2nd edition. New York: RAINBO; 1995.
9. Adongo PA. Female Genital Mutilation: Socio-Cultural Factors that Influence the Practice in KassenaNankana District, Ghana. Afr J Reprod Health. 1998; 2:25-36
10. Akweongo P. Appiah-Yeboah S, Sakeah E, Phillips JF, Jackson E. It's a Woman's Thing: Gender RolesSustaining the Practice of Female Genital Mutilation among the Kassena-Nankana of Northern Ghana. a paper presented at the Population Association of America, Washington DC: 2001
11. 1. Von der Osten-Sacken T. Uwer T. Is Female Genital Mutilation an Islamic problem? Middle East Q.2007; 14: 29-36.
12. Hayford SR, Trinitapoli J. Religious Differences in Female Genital Cutting: A Case Study from Burkina Faso. J Sci Study Relig. 2011; 50: 252-271. PMID: 21969936
13. Anarfi KJ. To Change or not to Change: Obstacles and Resistance to Sexual Behavioural Change among the Youth in Ghana in the Era of AIDS. Res Rev. 19: 27-45
14. Ghana Government. The Criminal Code (Amendment Act), (Act 484): An Act to amend the Criminal Code, 1960 (Act 29). 1994
15. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/female-genital-mutilation-and-cutting-spotlight-initiative-report CITED 28/06/2023).
16. (https://www.unicef.org/nigeria/stories/southeast-nigeria-men-are-helping-end-practice-female-genital-mutilation CITED 28/06/2023)
17. Johansen, R. E. B., Diop, N. J., Laverack, G., & Leye, E. (2013). What works and what does not: A discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of female genital mutilation. Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2013, Article 348248. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/348248
18. UNICEF. (2020b). Female Genital Mutilation: A new generation calls for ending an old practice. https://data.unicef.org/resources/female-genital-mutilation-a-new-generationcalls-for-ending-an-old-practice/
19. Shell-Duncan, B., Njue, C., & Moore, Z. (2018). Trends in medicalisation of female genital mutilation/cutting: What do the data reveal? Research to Help Women Thrive. Population Council. https://doi.org/10.31899/rh6.1038
20. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. Female genital cutting. 2013. Available at https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR293/FR293.pdf

Most read articles by the same author(s)