Analysis of Caesarean Deliveries (CD) at a Tertiary Hospital in Northeastern Nigeria: A 5 Year Review.

Main Article Content

Umaru Inuwa
Maisaratu A. Bakari
Kaitafi Ahmad Tijjani
Kadas Saidu

Keywords

Caesarean delivery, trend, outcome, tertiary hospital, Northeastern Nigeria

Abstract

Background: One of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in Obstetrics is caesarean delivery (CD), and certainly the oldest surgical operation. Caesarean delivery is life-saving, especially when there is a failure or contraindication to vaginal delivery. However, the health risk and the cost of the surgery may be quite challenging, especially in low-resource countries like Nigeria.  The observed increased prevalence rate in recent times is alarming and has become a major public health concern, calling for regular appraisal of its indications in order to reduce the prevalence. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence, trend, indications, maternal and foetal outcomes at Modibbo Adama University Teaching Hospital, Yola, Adamawa State. Nigeria.


Methodology: It was a hospital-based retrospective study of all the cases of CD undertaken between 1st January 2018 and 31st December 2022. Names and hospital numbers of patients were identified; the case folders were traced and retrieved. Necessary information was obtained and analyzed using SPSS version 17 software. Results were presented in percentages, simple graphs, and ratios.


Results: During the years under review, there were 8568 deliveries, out of which 2707 had cesarean delivery, giving a cesarean delivery rate of 31.6%. The major maternal indication was prolonged obstructed labor, 627 (23.09%), while that of foetal indication was foetal distress, 418 (15.44%). The trend of caesarean delivery in this study showed a steady increase between 2018 and 2019 and 2021 to 2022, with a drop in 2020. This was due to the lockdown following the COVID-19 pandemic in that year. The maternal mortality ratio was 776/100,000 live births, and case fatality was 0.8%, while perinatal mortality was 41/1000 births.


Conclusion: The caesarean delivery rate in this study was very high when compared to most teaching hospitals in Nigeria.  Effort should therefore be made to reverse the ugly trend. Therefore, a thorough and meticulous assessment of patients should be done before a decision is taken for surgery, especially elective caesarean deliveries.

Abstract 154 | PDF Downloads 110 EPUB Downloads 40

References

1.Incerpi MH, Operative Delivery in Decherney AH, Nathan L, Laufer N, Roman AS (eds). Current Diagnosis and Treatement Obstetrics and Gynaecology, New York; McGraw Hall. 2013;11:334-348
2.Avidime AR, Mohammed Z, Iman H. An Audit of Caeserean Section in a Tertiary Hospital Northwest Nigeria. Tropical J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;32:6-12.
3.Berglundh S, Benova L, Olisaekee G, Hanson C caesarean section rate in Nigeri between 2013- 2018 by obstetrics risk and socio-economic status. Top Med INT Health.2021; 26 (7):775-788.
4.Isah AD, Adewole NZ, Zaman J. A five year survey of cesarean delivery at a Nigerian tertiary Hospital. Trop. J Obstet Gynaecol 2018, 35:14-17.
5. Akonta PI, Akinwunmi F, Umejiego C. An analysis of Cesarean section in a community cottage hospital in Nigeria. Niger Delta using the Robson classification. Niger Med J .2022 63(2):91-97.
6.Ismail WO, Bello IS, Olowookere SA, Ibrahim AO, Agbesanwa TA, Adekunle WA. Cesarean delivery rate and indication at a secondary Health care Facility in Ibadan,South western Nigeria: a five year review. Afr. Health Sci.2021:21(1):320-326.
7.Osanyande I, Ogunyemi O, Gwacham- Anisiobi U, Olaniran A., Yaya S, Barke TA. Prevalence, indication and complications of cesarean section in health facilities across Nigeria. A systematic review and meta-analysis, Reproductive Health 2023; 20(1): 81.
8.Moges GT, Nega F, Balay MH, Kibret S, Fentie Y, Addis WD, Fenta E. Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in a comprehensive specialized hospital of Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study; 2020 Ann Med Surg(Lond).2021,67: 102520.
9.Decision to delivery interval perinatal outcome and factors following Emergency ceasarean in southern Ethopia. Beyene K et al. Ethopian J Health Sci. 2023, PMID:36890945.
10.Mamal J, Asiegbu O, Asiegbu U, Ekwedigwe K, Nnadozie U, Okafor L. Asix year review of caesarean section at the federal medical Teaching Hospital Abakalike. Ebonyi state, south East Nigeria. Open Journal of obstetrics and Gynaecology 2020;10, 1669-1676.
11.ARULKUMARAN S. Malpresentations, Malpositon, Cephalopelvic Disproportion and Obstetric Procedures in: Dewhursts Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecolgy. Edmonds DK(ed),christopher lee,tom bourne . 9th Edition John Wiley and sons lt. 2012; 311-325.
12.Yakasai IA, Abubakar MY. Trends in Elective Caeserean Section rate in Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital Kano: A four year review. Glo Adv Res J Med Med Sci. 2014;080-083.
13.Akadri AA, Imaralu JO, Salami OF, Nwankpa CC, Adepoju AA. Robson classification of caesarean births: implications for reducing caesarean section rate in a private tertiary hospital in Nigeria. BMC pregnancy childbirth. 2023, 23(1):243.
14.Obed J.Y, Bako BG, Agida TE, Nwobodo El. Caesarean Delivery on Maternal request, Consultant’s View and Practice in the West African Sub Region. J West Afr Coll of Surgeons. 2013;3(1):72-83.
15.Adewuyi EO,Auta A,Khanal V, Tpshak SJ, Zhao Y. caesarean delivery in Nigeria:prevalence and associated factors – a population -based cross sectional BMJ open study,2019; 9(6):e027273.
16.Takai IU, Bar AM, Bukar M, Gaya SA, Ugwa EA. Caesarean Delivery in a Tertiary Institution in North-Eastern Nigeria. A 5year review. Trop J Obstet and Gynaecol 2015;32(2):21-27.
17.Gibbson L, Behzan JM, Lauer JA, Merialchi M, Althabe F. The Global Numbers and Cost of Additional Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Perfromed Per Year: Overused as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. WHO report (2010). Background paper, no 30.
18.Ugwu EOV, Obioha KCE, Okezie, Ugwu AO. A five years survey of caesarean delivery at a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital, Ann Med Health Sci Res 2011;1(1):77-84
19.Faremi AF, Ibitoye OF, Olatubi MI, Koledoye PN, Ogbeye GB. Attitude of pregnant woman in South Western Nigeria towards caesarean section as a method of birth. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;3(3):701-714.
20.Nwobodo EL, Isah AY, Panti A. Elective caesarean section in a Tertiary Hospital in Sokoto, Northwestern Nigeria Nig. Med. J 2011;1(52):263-265.
21.Inyang-Eton EC, Etuk SJ. Demographic and Obstetrics Determinants of Emergency caesarean section among women in Calabar, Nigeria. Glo Res.J.Med Sci 2013;3(1):20-24.
22.Adekanle DA, Adeyemi AS,Fasanu AO. Caesarean section at a tertiary institution in southwestern Nigeria-A 6-year audit. Open J Obstet Gynaecol, 2013,3:357-361.
23.Ugwu GO, Chukwuemeka A, Hyacinth EO, Vincent EE, Frank OE. Maternal and perinatal outcome of delivery after a previous caesarean section in Enugu, southeast Nigeria: a retrospective observational study. Int. J of women Health. 2014;6:301-305.
24.Geidam AD, Audu BM, Kawuwa BM, Obed JY. Rising trends and indications of caesarean section at the universityof Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Annals of afri med.2009:8(2):127-132.
25.Baowari YD. Indication for caesarean section at a Nigerian District Hospital. The Nigeria Health journal, 2012; 12(2):43-46.