Effectiveness of Conventional & Jigsaw Method of Self-directed Learning and Interactive Lecture in Undergraduate Physiology Teaching – A Comparative Study.

Main Article Content

Debasish Chakraborty https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7255-1782
Satabdi Saha https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0620-9767

Keywords

Teaching Learning Method (TLM), Self-Directed Learning (SDL), Jigsaw method, Interactive lecture

Abstract

Background: Medical professionals are expected to be lifelong learners, and the contemporary medical curriculum emphasizes learner-centered education with active student participation. The Competency-Based Medical Education framework promotes the use of active learning strategies such as self-directed learning (SDL), problem-based learning, and small group teaching. However, evidence comparing conventional SDL, the jigsaw method of SDL, and interactive lectures in undergraduate physiology remains limited. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these teaching–learning methods among first-year MBBS students at Agartala Government Medical College.


Methodology: This educational interventional crossover study was conducted among 150 first-year MBBS students at Agartala Government Medical College from March to August 2025. Students were exposed to interactive lectures, conventional SDL, and the jigsaw method of SDL across cardiovascular (CVS), respiratory (RS), and central nervous system (CNS) modules. Knowledge was assessed using 10-item multiple-choice pre-tests and post-tests. Data were analyzed using paired and unpaired Student’s t-tests. Standardized effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s d. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Results: Baseline pre-test scores were comparable across groups (p>0.05; d ≤0.32). Post-test scores were significantly higher with the jigsaw method of SDL compared to conventional SDL for CVS (78.47±11.15 vs 71.09±18.77; p=0.024; d=0.48), RS (84.52±9.16 vs 75.65±15.44; p=0.002; d=0.70), and CNS (83.26±26.34 vs 60.00±19.79; p<0.001; d=1.00). Interactive lectures performed better than conventional SDL for CVS (82.89±16.18 vs 71.09±18.77; p=0.002; d=-0.67) and CNS (71.06±13.87 vs 60.00±19.79; p=0.002; d=-0.65). Jigsaw method SDL was superior to interactive lectures for RS (84.52±9.16 vs 71.92±16.24; p<0.001; d=0.96) and CNS (83.26±26.34 vs 71.06±13.87; p=0.006; d=0.58).


Conclusion: Jigsaw-based self-directed learning is more effective than conventional SDL and interactive lectures in undergraduate physiology teaching, particularly for integrative topics. Its structured cooperative framework produces meaningful educational gains and supports the objectives of competency-based medical education.

Abstract 24 | PDF Downloads 7 EPUB Downloads 14

References

1.Palve S, Palve A. Comparative study of self-directed learning and traditional teaching method in understanding cardiorespiratory physiology among medical undergraduates. Biomedicine (Taipei). 2022; 42:138–42.
2.Devi S, Bhat KS, Ramya SR, Ravichandran K, Kanungo R. Self-directed learning to enhance active learning among second-year undergraduate medical students in microbiology: An experimental study. J Curr Res Sci Med. 2016; 2(2):80–3.
3.Shamsuddin F, Ilias L, Sreedharan S. A comparison of didactic lectures and self-directed learning in medical education. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2017; 4(22):110–4.
4.Guru V, Veerapu N. A comparison of self-directed learning and lecture methods for teaching embryology among first-year medical students. Sch Int J Anat Physiol. 2019; 2:352–5.
5.Robinson JD, Persky AM. Developing self-directed learners. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020; 84(3):847512. doi:10.5688/ajpe847512
6.Singaravelu V, Madhusudan U. Jigsaw teaching versus small group teaching: A comparative study among Phase III MBBS students in the department of paediatrics. J Pediatr Rev. 2021; 9(4):347–54.
7.Gowda VBSR, Sumathi ME, Chatterjee S, Paul S. Effectiveness of cooperative learning by jigsaw method in understanding biochemistry for first-year MBBS students: A randomised interventional study. Natl J Lab Med [Internet]. 2022 Oct [cited 2025 Mar 10]; 11(4):BO06–10. Available from: http://www.jcdr.net/back_issues.asp
8.Vinay AV, Raghuramaiah S, Rasalkar K. Exploring peer learning module versus conventional tutorials: Effects on engagement and learning outcomes among first-year medical students. Res Sq [Internet]. 2024 Mar [cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4016796/v1
9.Chaudhuri A, Paul S, Goswami A. A comparative study to evaluate the role of interactive lecture classes and self-directed learning sessions among first MBBS students in the department of physiology during implementation of competency-based medical education. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2020; 7(46):2714–8. doi:10.18410/jebmh/2020/558
10.Arroyo-Jimenez MM, Marcos P, Martinez-Marcos A, Artacho-Perula E, Blaizot X, Muñoz M, Alfonso-Roca MT, Insausti R. Gross anatomy dissections and self-directed learning in medicine. Clin Anat. 2005; 18(5):385–91. doi:10.1002/ca.20129